WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsPaymentus Holdings, Inc. (PAY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 302% more annual revenue ($4.81B vs $1.20B). PAY leads profitability with a 5.6% profit margin vs -3.4%. PAY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.01

PAY

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 6.56
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

PAYFair Value (-0.8%)

Margin of Safety

-0.8%

Fair Value

$24.34

Current Price

$25.10

$0.76 premium

UndervaluedFair: $24.34Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.67B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

PAY4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
51.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 51.7% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
6.5610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
28.1%8/10

Revenue surging 28.1% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.372/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
22.1x2/10

Trading at 22.1x book value

PAY3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.6%3/10

5.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
48.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PAY

The strongest argument for PAY centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 28.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : PAY

The primary concerns for PAY are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 48.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PAY carries more volatility with a beta of 1.50 — expect wider price swings.

PAY is growing revenue faster at 28.1% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (376M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PAY scores higher overall (52/100 vs 40/100) and 28.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Paymentus Holdings, Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Paymentus Holdings, Inc. provides electronic bill submission and payment services. The company is headquartered in Redmond, Washington with additional offices in the United States, Canada, and India.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?