Carter’s Inc (CRI)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)
CRI
Carter’s Inc
$38.19
+0.10%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $1.42B
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
$114.23
-8.56%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $13.49B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 280% more annual revenue ($11.20B vs $2.95B). LULU leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 3.1%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.58. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).
CRI
Hold50
out of 100
Grade: D+
LULU
Buy64
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+36.7%
Fair Value
$59.72
Current Price
$38.19
$21.53 discount
Margin of Safety
+70.7%
Fair Value
$600.18
Current Price
$114.23
$485.95 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
3.1% margin — thin
Operating margin of 4.2%
4.3% revenue growth
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 35.0%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CRI
The strongest argument for CRI centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.
Bull Case : LULU
The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : CRI
The primary concerns for CRI are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 3.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : LULU
The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 0.86 — expect wider price swings.
CRI is growing revenue faster at 8.1% — sustainability is the question.
LULU generates stronger free cash flow (87M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor APPAREL RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
LULU scores higher overall (64/100 vs 50/100). CRI offers better value entry with a 36.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Carter’s Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA
Carter's, Inc. designs, supplies, and markets branded children's clothing under the brands Carter's, OshKosh, Skip Hop, Child of Mine, Just One You, Simple Joys, Carter's little baby basics, and other brands in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA
lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.
Visit Website →Compare with Other APPAREL RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?