WallStSmart

Cresud SACIF y A (CRESY)vsGraham Holdings Co (GHC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cresud SACIF y A generates 20794% more annual revenue ($1.04T vs $4.98B). CRESY leads profitability with a 18.0% profit margin vs 6.0%. CRESY trades at a lower P/E of 6.0x. GHC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CRESY

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.83

GHC

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 4.0Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.17
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRESY.

GHCSignificantly Overvalued (-30.9%)

Margin of Safety

-30.9%

Fair Value

$846.92

Current Price

$1233.96

$387.04 premium

UndervaluedFair: $846.92Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRESY2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

GHC5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
21.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 21.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

CRESY4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$795.78M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.493/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-26.3%2/10

Earnings declined 26.3%

GHC3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
6.3%3/10

ROE of 6.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.0%3/10

6.0% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
4.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRESY

The strongest argument for CRESY centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.0% and operating margin at 12.2%.

Bull Case : GHC

The strongest argument for GHC centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : CRESY

The primary concerns for CRESY are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : GHC

The primary concerns for GHC are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GHC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.72 — expect wider price swings.

GHC is growing revenue faster at 6.0% — sustainability is the question.

GHC generates stronger free cash flow (49M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor CONGLOMERATES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

GHC scores higher overall (56/100 vs 55/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cresud SACIF y A

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Cresud Sociedad Annima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria, an agricultural company, produces agricultural commodities in Brazil and other Latin American countries. The company is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Visit Website →

Graham Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Graham Holdings Company is a diversified global media and education company. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?