WallStSmart

Coty Inc (COTY)vsProcter & Gamble Company (PG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Procter & Gamble Company generates 1399% more annual revenue ($87.03B vs $5.81B). PG leads profitability with a 18.4% profit margin vs -10.4%. COTY appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.18. PG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

COTY

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.5Value: 8.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.16

PG

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COTYUndervalued (+63.9%)

Margin of Safety

+63.9%

Fair Value

$7.00

Current Price

$2.70

$4.30 discount

UndervaluedFair: $7.00Overvalued
PGSignificantly Overvalued (-44.5%)

Margin of Safety

-44.5%

Fair Value

$100.54

Current Price

$145.27

$44.73 premium

UndervaluedFair: $100.54Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COTY2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1810/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PG4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$337.41B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
29.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
22.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.87B8/10

Generating 4.9B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

COTY4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.3%4/10

1.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.153/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-17.2%2/10

ROE of -17.2% — below average capital efficiency

PG3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
3.662/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.5%2/10

Earnings declined 15.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COTY

The strongest argument for COTY centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.18 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PG

The strongest argument for PG centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.4% and operating margin at 22.1%.

Bear Case : COTY

The primary concerns for COTY are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : PG

The primary concerns for PG are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COTY profiles as a turnaround stock while PG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

COTY carries more volatility with a beta of 0.95 — expect wider price swings.

PG is growing revenue faster at 1.5% — sustainability is the question.

PG generates stronger free cash flow (4.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PG scores higher overall (55/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 18.4% margins. COTY offers better value entry with a 63.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Coty Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Coty Inc., manufactures, markets, distributes and sells beauty products worldwide. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Procter & Gamble Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?