WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 539% more annual revenue ($60.28B vs $9.43B). COP leads profitability with a 13.3% profit margin vs 8.2%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.16. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

COP

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

QSR

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.93
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-157.1%)

Margin of Safety

-157.1%

Fair Value

$43.25

Current Price

$128.93

$85.68 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.25Overvalued
QSRSignificantly Overvalued (-295.4%)

Margin of Safety

-295.4%

Fair Value

$17.88

Current Price

$72.92

$55.04 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.88Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$157.60B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.29B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

QSR2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
24.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
26.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.4%

Areas to Watch

COP3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.8%2/10

Revenue declined 6.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-39.0%2/10

Earnings declined 39.0%

QSR3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-57.4%2/10

Earnings declined 57.4%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.932/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a declining stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

QSR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.56 — expect wider price swings.

QSR is growing revenue faster at 7.4% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (57/100 vs 48/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?