WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsCross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 1072118% more annual revenue ($60.28B vs $5.62M). CRT leads profitability with a 79.1% profit margin vs 13.3%. CRT trades at a lower P/E of 13.1x. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

COP

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

CRT

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-157.1%)

Margin of Safety

-157.1%

Fair Value

$43.25

Current Price

$128.93

$85.68 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.25Overvalued
CRTSignificantly Overvalued (-70.8%)

Margin of Safety

-70.8%

Fair Value

$5.03

Current Price

$9.50

$4.47 premium

UndervaluedFair: $5.03Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$157.60B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.29B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

CRT3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
79.1%10/10

Keeps 79 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
77.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 77.9%

P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

COP3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.8%2/10

Revenue declined 6.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-39.0%2/10

Earnings declined 39.0%

CRT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$58.32M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
1.9%3/10

ROE of 1.9% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
25.7x2/10

Trading at 25.7x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : CRT

The strongest argument for CRT centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 79.1% and operating margin at 77.9%.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CRT

The primary concerns for CRT are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.28 — expect wider price swings.

COP is growing revenue faster at -6.8% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (48/100 vs 39/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust is an express trust in the United States. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?