WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsCross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 1316369% more annual revenue ($59.38B vs $4.51M). CRT leads profitability with a 71.2% profit margin vs 12.3%. COP trades at a lower P/E of 19.8x. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

COP

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 6.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.29

CRT

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 10.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for COP.

CRTSignificantly Overvalued (-15.3%)

Margin of Safety

-15.3%

Fair Value

$7.45

Current Price

$10.74

$3.29 premium

UndervaluedFair: $7.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$142.38B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.988/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.35B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

CRT3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
151.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 151 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
71.2%10/10

Keeps 71 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
70.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 70.2%

Areas to Watch

COP2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.3%2/10

Revenue declined 5.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.2%2/10

Earnings declined 20.2%

CRT4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$64.50M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
30.7x2/10

Trading at 30.7x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-61.9%2/10

Revenue declined 61.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.98 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : CRT

The strongest argument for CRT centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 71.2% and operating margin at 70.2%.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CRT

The primary concerns for CRT are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.15 — expect wider price swings.

COP is growing revenue faster at -5.3% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (58/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust is an express trust in the United States. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?