WallStSmart

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS)vsTalen Energy Corporation (TLN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CMS Energy Corporation generates 136% more annual revenue ($8.81B vs $3.74B). CMS leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs -5.0%. CMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

CMS

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.65

TLN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.30

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TLN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
111.2%10/10

Revenue surging 111.2% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
34.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 34.5% YoY

Areas to Watch

CMS4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.364/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Debt/EquityHealth
1.973/10

Elevated debt levels

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.5%2/10

Revenue declined 0.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-43.9%2/10

Earnings declined 43.9%

TLN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
8.7x4/10

Trading at 8.7x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-11.4%2/10

ROE of -11.4% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-546.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMS

The strongest argument for CMS centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : TLN

The strongest argument for TLN centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 111.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CMS

The primary concerns for CMS are PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 1.97 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TLN

The primary concerns for TLN are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 5.92 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMS profiles as a declining stock while TLN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TLN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.63 — expect wider price swings.

TLN is growing revenue faster at 111.2% — sustainability is the question.

CMS generates stronger free cash flow (-345M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMS scores higher overall (48/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CMS Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

CMS Energy (NYSE: CMS), based in Jackson, Michigan, is an energy company that is focused principally on utility operations in Michigan.

Visit Website →

Talen Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Talen Energy Corporation (Ticker: TLN) is a prominent player in the U.S. power generation and infrastructure sector, committed to delivering reliable energy solutions through a robust portfolio that includes both traditional and renewable resources. The company emphasizes environmental sustainability and grid resilience, adapting to the increasing demand for electricity in a rapidly evolving energy landscape. With a strategic focus on innovation and advanced technology, Talen is well-positioned to capitalize on the transition to cleaner energy alternatives, making it an attractive investment opportunity for institutional investors.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?