WallStSmart

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CMS Energy Corporation generates 912% more annual revenue ($8.82B vs $871.93M). CMS leads profitability with a 12.6% profit margin vs 7.6%. CMS trades at a lower P/E of 20.4x. CMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

CMS

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 3.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.67

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMSSignificantly Overvalued (-53.5%)

Margin of Safety

-53.5%

Fair Value

$48.56

Current Price

$72.61

$24.05 premium

UndervaluedFair: $48.56Overvalued
KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CMS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.892/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-334.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.672/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMS

The strongest argument for CMS centers on Price/Book. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CMS

The primary concerns for CMS are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMS profiles as a value stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.38 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMS scores higher overall (60/100 vs 40/100) and 11.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CMS Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

CMS Energy (NYSE: CMS), based in Jackson, Michigan, is an energy company that is focused principally on utility operations in Michigan.

Visit Website →

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?