WallStSmart

Cummins Inc (CMI)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cummins Inc generates 3787% more annual revenue ($33.89B vs $871.93M). CMI leads profitability with a 7.9% profit margin vs 7.6%. CMI trades at a lower P/E of 35.5x. CMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

CMI

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.91

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMISignificantly Overvalued (-59.1%)

Margin of Safety

-59.1%

Fair Value

$376.46

Current Price

$679.55

$303.09 premium

UndervaluedFair: $376.46Overvalued
KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMI2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$94.23B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CMI4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.854/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMI

The strongest argument for CMI centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CMI

The primary concerns for CMI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMI profiles as a value stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CMI carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

CMI generates stronger free cash flow (120M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMI scores higher overall (47/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cummins Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Cummins is a Columbus, Indiana based multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and distributes engines, filtration, and power generation products. Cummins also services engines and related equipment, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission control, electrical power generation systems, and trucks.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?