WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsWilliams Companies Inc (WMB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 14% more annual revenue ($13.79B vs $12.11B). WMB leads profitability with a 23.1% profit margin vs 7.0%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

WMB

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.0Value: 4.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.37

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
52.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 52 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

WMB4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.6%

Market CapQuality
$89.22B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
23.1%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
25.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 25.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
46.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
20.6x2/10

Trading at 20.6x book value

WMB4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.484/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
32.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.372/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WMB

The strongest argument for WMB centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.1% and operating margin at 33.6%.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 46.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WMB

The primary concerns for WMB are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WMB is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.

WMB generates stronger free cash flow (244M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 65/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Williams Companies Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

The Williams Companies, Inc., is an American energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas processing and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generation assets.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?