WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsViking Holdings Ltd (VIK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 112% more annual revenue ($13.79B vs $6.50B). VIK leads profitability with a 17.6% profit margin vs 7.0%. VIK trades at a lower P/E of 32.7x. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

VIK

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 0.16

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
52.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 52 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

VIK4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
254.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 255 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
226.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 226.6% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
20.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.8%8/10

Revenue surging 27.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
46.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
20.6x2/10

Trading at 20.6x book value

VIK3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
33.7x2/10

Trading at 33.7x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.162/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : VIK

The strongest argument for VIK centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.6% and operating margin at 20.9%. Revenue growth of 27.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 46.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : VIK

The primary concerns for VIK are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while VIK is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VIK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.57 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.

VIK generates stronger free cash flow (675M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 66/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Viking Holdings Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · TRAVEL SERVICES · USA

Viking Holdings Ltd engages in the passenger shipping and other forms of passenger transport in North America, the United Kingdom, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?