WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsThermo Fisher Scientific Inc (TMO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc generates 228% more annual revenue ($45.20B vs $13.79B). TMO leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs 7.0%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

TMO

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.

TMOSignificantly Overvalued (-16.1%)

Margin of Safety

-16.1%

Fair Value

$408.60

Current Price

$465.00

$56.40 premium

UndervaluedFair: $408.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
52.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 52 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

TMO1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$176.32B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
46.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
20.6x2/10

Trading at 20.6x book value

TMO3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
26.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TMO

The strongest argument for TMO centers on Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 17.9%.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 46.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : TMO

The primary concerns for TMO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TMO is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.

TMO generates stronger free cash flow (816M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 62/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Thermo Fisher Scientific is an American provisioner of scientific instrumentation, reagents and consumables, and software and services to healthcare, life science, and other laboratories in academia, government, and industry (including in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors). Based in Waltham, Massachusetts, Thermo Fisher was created in 2006 by the merger of Thermo Electron and Fisher Scientific, to form a company with US$ 9 billion in combined revenues.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?