WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 762% more annual revenue ($12.39B vs $1.44B). CLS leads profitability with a 6.7% profit margin vs -122.0%. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

SONO

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLSUndervalued (+11.6%)

Margin of Safety

+11.6%

Fair Value

$334.62

Current Price

$302.22

$32.40 discount

UndervaluedFair: $334.62Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SONO.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
40.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 41 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.6%10/10

Revenue surging 43.6% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
77.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 77.7% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

SONO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
15.7x4/10

Trading at 15.7x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
42.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.60B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.9%2/10

ROE of -3.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-90.0%2/10

Revenue declined 90.0%

Profit MarginProfitability
-122.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 43.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 42.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SONO is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 43.6% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (158M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 42/100) and 43.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?