Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsResearch Frontiers Incorporated (REFR)
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$425.08
+2.61%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $45.20B
REFR
Research Frontiers Incorporated
$0.74
-1.60%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $25.73M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Celestica Inc. generates 1976039% more annual revenue ($13.79B vs $697,790). CLS leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs 0.0%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).
CLS
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
REFR
Avoid15
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.
Margin of Safety
+80.5%
Fair Value
$5.33
Current Price
$0.74
$4.59 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 47 in profit
Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY
Growing faster than its price suggests
No standout strengths identified
Areas to Watch
7.0% margin — thin
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Trading at 23.3x book value
Trading at 14.8x book value
0.0% earnings growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
0.0% margin — thin
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CLS
The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : REFR
REFR has a balanced fundamental profile.
Bear Case : CLS
The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 47.6x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : REFR
The primary concerns for REFR are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Market Cap.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while REFR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.
CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.
CLS generates stronger free cash flow (127M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 15/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. REFR offers better value entry with a 80.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Celestica Inc.
TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA
Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
Research Frontiers Incorporated
TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA
Research Frontiers Incorporated develops and markets technology and devices to control the flow of light globally. The company is headquartered in Woodbury, New York.
Compare with Other ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?