WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsOuster, Inc. Common Stock (OUST)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 7511% more annual revenue ($15.59B vs $204.91M). CLS leads profitability with a 7.2% profit margin vs -26.0%. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.87

OUST

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -1.51
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.

OUSTUndervalued (+24.3%)

Margin of Safety

+24.3%

Fair Value

$24.94

Current Price

$35.05

$10.11 discount

UndervaluedFair: $24.94Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
45.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
62.4%10/10

Revenue surging 62.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
74.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 74.2% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

OUST2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
55.9%10/10

Revenue surging 55.9% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
15.4x4/10

Trading at 15.4x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

OUST4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-20.3%2/10

ROE of -20.3% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-15.41M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-1.512/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 62.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : OUST

The strongest argument for OUST centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 55.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : OUST

The primary concerns for OUST are EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OUST carries more volatility with a beta of 3.25 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 62.4% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (147M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (67/100 vs 28/100) and 62.4% revenue growth. OUST offers better value entry with a 24.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Ouster, Inc. Common Stock

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Ouster, Inc. designs and manufactures digital lidar sensors for the industrial automation, intelligent infrastructure, robotics and automotive markets. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?