WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsNokia Corp ADR (NOK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 45% more annual revenue ($20.00B vs $13.79B). CLS leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs 4.0%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

NOK

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.

NOKUndervalued (+16.7%)

Margin of Safety

+16.7%

Fair Value

$8.81

Current Price

$12.35

$3.54 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
52.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 52 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$74.25B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
46.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
20.6x2/10

Trading at 20.6x book value

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.15 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 46.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 83.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while NOK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 40/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. NOK offers better value entry with a 16.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?