WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsNeonode Inc (NEON)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 637408% more annual revenue ($13.79B vs $2.16M). NEON leads profitability with a 386.6% profit margin vs 7.0%. NEON appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.37. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.87

NEON

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 8.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -4.32

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
46.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 47 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

NEON6 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3710/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
2.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
36.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
386.6%10/10

Keeps 387 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
47.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
23.3x2/10

Trading at 23.3x book value

NEON4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$20.73M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.12M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NEON

The strongest argument for NEON centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 386.6% and operating margin at -337.3%. Revenue growth of 19.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 47.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : NEON

The primary concerns for NEON are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while NEON is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (127M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 56/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Neonode Inc

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Neonode Inc., develops optical sensing solutions for touchless touch, touch, gesture detection, and in-cabin monitoring in the United States, Japan, South Korea, China, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?