Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsNeonode Inc (NEON)
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$302.22
+0.23%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $34.73B
NEON
Neonode Inc
$1.36
-2.86%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $24.34M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Celestica Inc. generates 600817% more annual revenue ($12.39B vs $2.06M). CLS leads profitability with a 6.7% profit margin vs 4.1%. NEON appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.37. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).
CLS
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
NEON
Buy52
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+11.6%
Fair Value
$334.62
Current Price
$302.22
$32.40 discount
Margin of Safety
+45.1%
Fair Value
$3.26
Current Price
$1.36
$1.90 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 41 in profit
Revenue surging 43.6% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 77.7% YoY
Growing faster than its price suggests
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Every $100 of equity generates 39 in profit
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Areas to Watch
Trading at 15.7x book value
6.7% margin — thin
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
0.0% earnings growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
4.1% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CLS
The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 43.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : NEON
The strongest argument for NEON centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.37 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : CLS
The primary concerns for CLS are Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 42.2x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : NEON
The primary concerns for NEON are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 4.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while NEON is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.38 — expect wider price swings.
CLS is growing revenue faster at 43.6% — sustainability is the question.
CLS generates stronger free cash flow (158M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 52/100) and 43.6% revenue growth. NEON offers better value entry with a 45.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Celestica Inc.
TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA
Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
Neonode Inc
TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA
Neonode Inc., develops optical sensing solutions for touchless touch, touch, gesture detection, and in-cabin monitoring in the United States, Japan, South Korea, China, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.
Visit Website →Compare with Other ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?