Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsMarvell Technology Group Ltd (MRVL)
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$425.08
+1.88%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $45.20B
MRVL
Marvell Technology Group Ltd
$316.43
-0.36%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $264.11B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Celestica Inc. generates 58% more annual revenue ($13.79B vs $8.72B). MRVL leads profitability with a 29.0% profit margin vs 7.0%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).
CLS
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
MRVL
Buy55
out of 100
Grade: C
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 47 in profit
Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY
Growing faster than its price suggests
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Revenue surging 27.6% year-over-year
Areas to Watch
7.0% margin — thin
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Trading at 23.3x book value
Expensive relative to growth rate
Trading at 18.7x book value
Grey zone — moderate risk
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CLS
The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : MRVL
The strongest argument for MRVL centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.0% and operating margin at 14.5%. Revenue growth of 27.6% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CLS
The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 47.6x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : MRVL
The primary concerns for MRVL are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 104.0x leaves little room for execution misses.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while MRVL is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
MRVL carries more volatility with a beta of 2.25 — expect wider price swings.
CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.
MRVL generates stronger free cash flow (483M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 55/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Celestica Inc.
TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA
Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
Marvell Technology Group Ltd
TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA
Marvell Technology, Inc. designs, develops, and sells analog, mixed-signal, digital signal processing, and integrated and independent integrated circuits. The company is headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware.
Visit Website →Compare with Other ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?