WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsInterlink Electronics Inc (LINK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 112008% more annual revenue ($13.79B vs $12.30M). CLS leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs -9.3%. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.87

LINK

Avoid

27

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -3.24
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.

LINKUndervalued (+56.9%)

Margin of Safety

+56.9%

Fair Value

$8.35

Current Price

$4.91

$3.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
46.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 47 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

LINK3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
2101.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2101.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.4%8/10

15.4% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
47.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
23.3x2/10

Trading at 23.3x book value

LINK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
8.8x4/10

Trading at 8.8x book value

Market CapQuality
$79.69M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-13.1%2/10

ROE of -13.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LINK

The strongest argument for LINK centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 15.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 47.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : LINK

The primary concerns for LINK are Price/Book, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while LINK is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (127M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 27/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. LINK offers better value entry with a 56.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Interlink Electronics Inc

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Interlink Electronics, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells force sensing technologies that incorporate proprietary material technology, firmware, and software into standard sensor-based products and custom sensor system solutions. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?