WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsLittelfuse Inc (LFUS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 419% more annual revenue ($12.39B vs $2.39B). CLS leads profitability with a 6.7% profit margin vs -3.0%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

LFUS

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.45
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLSUndervalued (+11.6%)

Margin of Safety

+11.6%

Fair Value

$334.62

Current Price

$302.22

$32.40 discount

UndervaluedFair: $334.62Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for LFUS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
40.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 41 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.6%10/10

Revenue surging 43.6% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
77.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 77.7% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

LFUS0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
15.7x4/10

Trading at 15.7x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
42.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

LFUS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.064/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
-3.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 43.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LFUS

Revenue growth of 12.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 42.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : LFUS

The primary concerns for LFUS are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while LFUS is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

LFUS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.42 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 43.6% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (158M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 45/100) and 43.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Littelfuse Inc

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Littelfuse, Inc. manufactures and sells circuit protection, power control, and sensing products in Asia-Pacific, the Americas, and Europe. The company is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?