WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 1481% more annual revenue ($13.79B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 7.0%. CLS trades at a lower P/E of 46.8x. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
52.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 52 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
46.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
20.6x2/10

Trading at 20.6x book value

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 46.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 52.8% — sustainability is the question.

CLS generates stronger free cash flow (127M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 40/100) and 52.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?