WallStSmart

Celestica Inc. (CLS)vsEdwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celestica Inc. generates 104% more annual revenue ($12.39B vs $6.07B). EW leads profitability with a 17.7% profit margin vs 6.7%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. CLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

EW

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLSUndervalued (+11.6%)

Margin of Safety

+11.6%

Fair Value

$334.62

Current Price

$302.22

$32.40 discount

UndervaluedFair: $334.62Overvalued
EWSignificantly Overvalued (-544.4%)

Margin of Safety

-544.4%

Fair Value

$12.31

Current Price

$82.67

$70.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.31Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
40.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 41 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.6%10/10

Revenue surging 43.6% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
77.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 77.7% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
23.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.7%

Areas to Watch

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
15.7x4/10

Trading at 15.7x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
42.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.144/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
45.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.6%2/10

Earnings declined 76.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 43.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 23.7%. Revenue growth of 13.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 42.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 45.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLS profiles as a hypergrowth stock while EW is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.38 — expect wider price swings.

CLS is growing revenue faster at 43.6% — sustainability is the question.

EW generates stronger free cash flow (354M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 55/100) and 43.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?