WallStSmart

Clean Energy Fuels Corp (CLNE)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 76143% more annual revenue ($323.90B vs $424.83M). XOM leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -52.3%. XOM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.38. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

CLNE

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.18

XOM

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLNEUndervalued (+79.7%)

Margin of Safety

+79.7%

Fair Value

$12.94

Current Price

$2.30

$10.64 discount

UndervaluedFair: $12.94Overvalued
XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-46.3%)

Margin of Safety

-46.3%

Fair Value

$105.46

Current Price

$154.33

$48.87 premium

UndervaluedFair: $105.46Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLNE2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
512.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 512.0% YoY

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$642.90B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.23B8/10

Generating 5.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CLNE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$484.94M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.722/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

XOM3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.3%2/10

Revenue declined 1.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLNE

The strongest argument for CLNE centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CLNE

The primary concerns for CLNE are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLNE profiles as a turnaround stock while XOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLNE carries more volatility with a beta of 2.03 — expect wider price swings.

CLNE is growing revenue faster at 2.7% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (5.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XOM scores higher overall (50/100 vs 45/100). CLNE offers better value entry with a 79.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS REFINING & MARKETING · USA

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. The company is headquartered in Newport Beach, California.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?