WallStSmart

Clean Harbors Inc (CLH)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 1140% more annual revenue ($75.11B vs $6.06B). CLH leads profitability with a 6.5% profit margin vs 6.4%. CLH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.27. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

CLH

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.17

LMT

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLHSignificantly Overvalued (-42.0%)

Margin of Safety

-42.0%

Fair Value

$193.31

Current Price

$283.03

$89.72 premium

UndervaluedFair: $193.31Overvalued
LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-53.9%)

Margin of Safety

-53.9%

Fair Value

$340.34

Current Price

$519.10

$178.76 premium

UndervaluedFair: $340.34Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLH1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.2710/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

LMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
64.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 64 in profit

Market CapQuality
$118.38B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CLH4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
39.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.9%4/10

1.9% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.5%3/10

6.5% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.103/10

Elevated debt levels

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
15.9x4/10

Trading at 15.9x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLH

The strongest argument for CLH centers on PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.27 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CLH

The primary concerns for CLH are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLH carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.

CLH is growing revenue faster at 1.9% — sustainability is the question.

CLH generates stronger free cash flow (-93M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor WASTE MANAGEMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (55/100 vs 51/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Clean Harbors Inc

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

Clean Harbors, Inc. provides environmental and industrial services in North America. The company is headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?