WallStSmart

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF)vsTernium SA ADR (TX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc generates 21% more annual revenue ($18.90B vs $15.61B). TX leads profitability with a 3.7% profit margin vs -6.4%. TX appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.13. TX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

CLF

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.0Value: 8.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.13

TX

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 7.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.14
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLFUndervalued (+66.5%)

Margin of Safety

+66.5%

Fair Value

$37.24

Current Price

$13.53

$23.71 discount

UndervaluedFair: $37.24Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TX.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLF2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TX6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
218.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 218.1% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

CLF4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.333/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-20.9%2/10

ROE of -20.9% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-99.4%2/10

Earnings declined 99.4%

TX4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
4.7%3/10

ROE of 4.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLF

The strongest argument for CLF centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.43 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TX

The strongest argument for TX centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.13 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CLF

The primary concerns for CLF are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : TX

The primary concerns for TX are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLF profiles as a turnaround stock while TX is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLF carries more volatility with a beta of 2.09 — expect wider price swings.

CLF is growing revenue faster at 6.3% — sustainability is the question.

TX generates stronger free cash flow (-189M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TX scores higher overall (60/100 vs 49/100). CLF offers better value entry with a 66.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. is an independent iron ore mining company in the United States, Canada and internationally. The company is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio.

Visit Website →

Ternium SA ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA

Ternium SA manufactures and processes various steel products in Mexico, Argentina, Paraguay, Chile, Bolivia, Uruguay, Brazil, the United States, Colombia, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua. The company is headquartered in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?