WallStSmart

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)vsUniversal Corporation (UVV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company generates 582% more annual revenue ($20.38B vs $2.99B). CL leads profitability with a 10.5% profit margin vs 3.7%. UVV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.89. UVV earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

CL

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9

UVV

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLSignificantly Overvalued (-279.8%)

Margin of Safety

-279.8%

Fair Value

$22.51

Current Price

$85.49

$62.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.51Overvalued
UVVUndervalued (+74.6%)

Margin of Safety

+74.6%

Fair Value

$207.79

Current Price

$51.95

$155.84 discount

UndervaluedFair: $207.79Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
49.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 50 in profit

Market CapQuality
$67.75B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.28B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

UVV3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
32.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 32.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

CL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.262/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

UVV3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Market CapQuality
$1.32B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
2.892/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CL

The strongest argument for CL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : UVV

The strongest argument for UVV centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CL

The primary concerns for CL are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 147.93 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UVV

The primary concerns for UVV are Market Cap, Profit Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

UVV carries more volatility with a beta of 0.67 — expect wider price swings.

UVV is growing revenue faster at 6.1% — sustainability is the question.

CL generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

UVV scores higher overall (61/100 vs 56/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Colgate-Palmolive Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Colgate-Palmolive Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. It specializes in the production, distribution and provision of household, health care, personal care and veterinary products.

Visit Website →

Universal Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · TOBACCO · USA

Universal Corporation processes and supplies leaf tobacco and plant ingredients worldwide. The company is headquartered in Richmond, Virginia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?