WallStSmart

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)vsQnity Electronics, Inc (Q)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company generates 329% more annual revenue ($20.38B vs $4.75B). Q leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs 10.5%. Q appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.41. CL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CL

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLSignificantly Overvalued (-279.8%)

Margin of Safety

-279.8%

Fair Value

$22.51

Current Price

$85.49

$62.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.51Overvalued
QSignificantly Overvalued (-410.3%)

Margin of Safety

-410.3%

Fair Value

$22.44

Current Price

$120.26

$97.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
49.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 50 in profit

Market CapQuality
$67.75B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.28B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Areas to Watch

CL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.262/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Q4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.414/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CL

The strongest argument for CL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : CL

The primary concerns for CL are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 147.93 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

Q is growing revenue faster at 8.1% — sustainability is the question.

CL generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CL scores higher overall (56/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Colgate-Palmolive Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Colgate-Palmolive Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. It specializes in the production, distribution and provision of household, health care, personal care and veterinary products.

Visit Website →

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Compare with Other HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?