WallStSmart

Chemed Corp (CHE)vsFresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 676% more annual revenue ($19.63B vs $2.53B). CHE leads profitability with a 10.5% profit margin vs 5.0%. FMS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

CHE

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 5.81

FMS

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CHESignificantly Overvalued (-270.8%)

Margin of Safety

-270.8%

Fair Value

$124.85

Current Price

$374.02

$249.17 premium

UndervaluedFair: $124.85Overvalued
FMSUndervalued (+73.4%)

Margin of Safety

+73.4%

Fair Value

$90.32

Current Price

$22.03

$68.29 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CHE3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.8110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
25.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.139/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

FMS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

CHE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.604/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.1%2/10

Revenue declined 0.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.1%2/10

Earnings declined 9.1%

FMS4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.824/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
7.9%3/10

ROE of 7.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.0%3/10

5.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CHE

The strongest argument for CHE centers on Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : FMS

The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CHE

The primary concerns for CHE are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : FMS

The primary concerns for FMS are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CHE profiles as a declining stock while FMS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

FMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

CHE is growing revenue faster at -0.1% — sustainability is the question.

FMS generates stronger free cash flow (564M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FMS scores higher overall (62/100 vs 51/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Chemed Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

Chemed Corporation provides hospice and hospice services to patients through a network of physicians, registered nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy, and volunteers across the United States. The company is headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Visit Website →

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?