WallStSmart

Celanese Corporation (CE)vsTronox Holdings PLC (TROX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celanese Corporation generates 225% more annual revenue ($9.49B vs $2.92B). CE leads profitability with a -11.6% profit margin vs -15.8%. TROX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

CE

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.28

TROX

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.77
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CEUndervalued (+29.1%)

Margin of Safety

+29.1%

Fair Value

$85.47

Current Price

$51.03

$34.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $85.47Overvalued
TROXUndervalued (+75.3%)

Margin of Safety

+75.3%

Fair Value

$34.11

Current Price

$7.34

$26.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $34.11Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CE2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
28.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.2% YoY

TROX3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

EPS GrowthGrowth
48.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 48.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

CE4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-26.9%2/10

ROE of -26.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Revenue declined 2.2%

TROX4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.0%4/10

3.0% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$1.16B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-30.8%2/10

ROE of -30.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CE

The strongest argument for CE centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : TROX

The strongest argument for TROX centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CE

The primary concerns for CE are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 3.09 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TROX

The primary concerns for TROX are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TROX carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.

TROX is growing revenue faster at 3.0% — sustainability is the question.

CE generates stronger free cash flow (10M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor CHEMICALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TROX scores higher overall (48/100 vs 47/100). CE offers better value entry with a 29.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celanese Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Celanese Corporation is a Fortune 500 global technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas, United States.

Tronox Holdings PLC

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Tronox Holdings plc is a vertically integrated manufacturer of TiO2 pigment in North America, South and Central America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?