Braskem SA Class A (BAK)vsCelanese Corporation (CE)
BAK
Braskem SA Class A
$1.13
+2.73%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $438.33M
CE
Celanese Corporation
$51.26
-0.37%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $5.37B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Braskem SA Class A generates 617% more annual revenue ($70.60B vs $9.85B). CE leads profitability with a 2.7% profit margin vs -7.8%. BAK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.46. CE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).
BAK
Hold48
out of 100
Grade: D+
CE
Hold48
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for BAK.
Margin of Safety
+29.9%
Fair Value
$86.44
Current Price
$51.26
$35.18 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Earnings expanding 107.2% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Revenue surging 21.6% year-over-year
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -549.0% — below average capital efficiency
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
2.7% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of -26.9% — below average capital efficiency
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BAK
The strongest argument for BAK centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 21.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : CE
The strongest argument for CE centers on Price/Book.
Bear Case : BAK
The primary concerns for BAK are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.
Bear Case : CE
The primary concerns for CE are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.82 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BAK profiles as a growth stock while CE is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
BAK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.
BAK is growing revenue faster at 21.6% — sustainability is the question.
CE generates stronger free cash flow (469M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BAK scores higher overall (48/100 vs 48/100) and 21.6% revenue growth. CE offers better value entry with a 29.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Braskem SA Class A
BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA
Braskem SA produces and markets thermoplastic resins. The company is headquartered in Camaari, Brazil.
Celanese Corporation
BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA
Celanese Corporation is a Fortune 500 global technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas, United States.
Compare with Other CHEMICALS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?