WallStSmart

Celanese Corporation (CE)vsLsb Industries Inc (LXU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celanese Corporation generates 1451% more annual revenue ($9.54B vs $615.21M). LXU leads profitability with a 4.0% profit margin vs -12.2%. LXU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.42. LXU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

CE

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.30

LXU

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.54
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CE.

LXUSignificantly Overvalued (-347.2%)

Margin of Safety

-347.2%

Fair Value

$2.31

Current Price

$15.81

$13.50 premium

UndervaluedFair: $2.31Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CE2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
28.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.2% YoY

LXU3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.3%8/10

Revenue surging 22.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CE4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-22.5%2/10

ROE of -22.5% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.5%2/10

Revenue declined 6.5%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.302/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

LXU4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.544/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$1.04B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.9%3/10

ROE of 4.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CE

The strongest argument for CE centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : LXU

The strongest argument for LXU centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 22.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.42 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CE

The primary concerns for CE are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : LXU

The primary concerns for LXU are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 42.4x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CE profiles as a turnaround stock while LXU is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.05 — expect wider price swings.

LXU is growing revenue faster at 22.3% — sustainability is the question.

CE generates stronger free cash flow (168M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LXU scores higher overall (54/100 vs 47/100) and 22.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celanese Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Celanese Corporation is a Fortune 500 global technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas, United States.

Lsb Industries Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

LSB Industries, Inc. manufactures, markets, and sells chemical products in the United States. The company is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?