WallStSmart

Celanese Corporation (CE)vsLsb Industries Inc (LXU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celanese Corporation generates 1380% more annual revenue ($9.49B vs $641.26M). LXU leads profitability with a 7.2% profit margin vs -11.6%. LXU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.42. LXU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

CE

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.28

LXU

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CEUndervalued (+29.1%)

Margin of Safety

+29.1%

Fair Value

$85.47

Current Price

$51.03

$34.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $85.47Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for LXU.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CE2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
28.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.2% YoY

LXU3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.2%8/10

18.2% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

CE4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-26.9%2/10

ROE of -26.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Revenue declined 2.2%

LXU4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$876.22M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.2%2/10

Earnings declined 69.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CE

The strongest argument for CE centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : LXU

The strongest argument for LXU centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 18.2% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.42 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CE

The primary concerns for CE are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 3.09 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : LXU

The primary concerns for LXU are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CE profiles as a turnaround stock while LXU is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.

LXU is growing revenue faster at 18.2% — sustainability is the question.

LXU generates stronger free cash flow (35M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LXU scores higher overall (57/100 vs 47/100) and 18.2% revenue growth. CE offers better value entry with a 29.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celanese Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Celanese Corporation is a Fortune 500 global technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas, United States.

Lsb Industries Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

LSB Industries, Inc. manufactures, markets, and sells chemical products in the United States. The company is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?