WallStSmart

Celanese Corporation (CE)vsGreen Plains Renewable Energy Inc (GPRE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celanese Corporation generates 390% more annual revenue ($9.49B vs $1.94B). GPRE leads profitability with a -0.8% profit margin vs -11.6%. GPRE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.16. CE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

CE

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.28

GPRE

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 7.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CEUndervalued (+29.1%)

Margin of Safety

+29.1%

Fair Value

$85.47

Current Price

$51.03

$34.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $85.47Overvalued
GPREUndervalued (+55.1%)

Margin of Safety

+55.1%

Fair Value

$34.53

Current Price

$14.97

$19.56 discount

UndervaluedFair: $34.53Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CE2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
28.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.2% YoY

GPRE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CE4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-26.9%2/10

ROE of -26.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Revenue declined 2.2%

GPRE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$1.05B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.0%2/10

ROE of -2.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CE

The strongest argument for CE centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : GPRE

The strongest argument for GPRE centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CE

The primary concerns for CE are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 3.09 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : GPRE

The primary concerns for GPRE are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GPRE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.19 — expect wider price swings.

CE is growing revenue faster at -2.2% — sustainability is the question.

CE generates stronger free cash flow (10M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor CHEMICALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CE scores higher overall (47/100 vs 46/100). GPRE offers better value entry with a 55.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celanese Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Celanese Corporation is a Fortune 500 global technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas, United States.

Green Plains Renewable Energy Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Green Plains Inc. produces, markets, and distributes ethanol in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?