WallStSmart

CareDx Inc (CDNA)vsThermo Fisher Scientific Inc (TMO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc generates 10848% more annual revenue ($45.20B vs $412.82M). TMO leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs -2.0%. TMO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CDNA

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.40

TMO

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CDNAUndervalued (+57.7%)

Margin of Safety

+57.7%

Fair Value

$46.59

Current Price

$28.82

$17.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $46.59Overvalued
TMOSignificantly Overvalued (-54.7%)

Margin of Safety

-54.7%

Fair Value

$331.71

Current Price

$513.03

$181.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $331.71Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CDNA2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
39.0%10/10

Revenue surging 39.0% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

TMO1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$190.65B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CDNA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.20B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
1.5%3/10

Operating margin of 1.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TMO3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.694/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CDNA

The strongest argument for CDNA centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 39.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TMO

The strongest argument for TMO centers on Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 17.9%.

Bear Case : CDNA

The primary concerns for CDNA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : TMO

The primary concerns for TMO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CDNA profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TMO is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CDNA carries more volatility with a beta of 2.48 — expect wider price swings.

CDNA is growing revenue faster at 39.0% — sustainability is the question.

TMO generates stronger free cash flow (816M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TMO scores higher overall (59/100 vs 37/100), backed by strong 15.1% margins. CDNA offers better value entry with a 57.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CareDx Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

CareDx, Inc. discovers, develops and markets diagnostic solutions for transplant patients and caregivers globally. The company is headquartered in South San Francisco, California.

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Thermo Fisher Scientific is an American provisioner of scientific instrumentation, reagents and consumables, and software and services to healthcare, life science, and other laboratories in academia, government, and industry (including in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors). Based in Waltham, Massachusetts, Thermo Fisher was created in 2006 by the merger of Thermo Electron and Fisher Scientific, to form a company with US$ 9 billion in combined revenues.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?