Concord Medical Services Holdings (CCM)vsFresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)
CCM
Concord Medical Services Holdings
$4.78
-5.53%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $20.19M
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
$22.03
+0.46%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $12.00B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 4104% more annual revenue ($19.36B vs $460.51M). FMS leads profitability with a 4.9% profit margin vs -20.2%. CCM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.57. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).
CCM
Hold43
out of 100
Grade: D
FMS
Buy50
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+68.0%
Fair Value
$11.95
Current Price
$4.78
$7.17 discount
Margin of Safety
+69.0%
Fair Value
$77.65
Current Price
$22.03
$55.62 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 57.4% year-over-year
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
0.0% earnings growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of -21.9% — below average capital efficiency
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 7.1% — below average capital efficiency
4.9% margin — thin
Revenue declined 5.5%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CCM
The strongest argument for CCM centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 57.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.57 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : FMS
The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.79 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : CCM
The primary concerns for CCM are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.
Bear Case : FMS
The primary concerns for FMS are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CCM profiles as a hypergrowth stock while FMS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
FMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.81 — expect wider price swings.
CCM is growing revenue faster at 57.4% — sustainability is the question.
FMS generates stronger free cash flow (37M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
FMS scores higher overall (50/100 vs 43/100). CCM offers better value entry with a 68.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Concord Medical Services Holdings
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · China
Concord Medical Services Holdings Limited, operates a network of radiotherapy and diagnostic imaging centers in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.
Visit Website →Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.
Visit Website →Compare with Other MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?