WallStSmart

CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 700% more annual revenue ($9.43B vs $1.18B). QSR leads profitability with a 8.2% profit margin vs 5.4%. QSR trades at a lower P/E of 28.1x. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

CAVA

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.98

QSR

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.93
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CAVASignificantly Overvalued (-1735.7%)

Margin of Safety

-1735.7%

Fair Value

$3.67

Current Price

$80.29

$76.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $3.67Overvalued
QSRSignificantly Overvalued (-295.4%)

Margin of Safety

-295.4%

Fair Value

$17.88

Current Price

$72.92

$55.04 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.88Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CAVA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.9%8/10

Revenue surging 20.9% year-over-year

QSR2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
24.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
26.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.4%

Areas to Watch

CAVA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
12.0x4/10

Trading at 12.0x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.984/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.4%3/10

5.4% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.4%3/10

Operating margin of 1.4%

QSR3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-57.4%2/10

Earnings declined 57.4%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.932/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CAVA

The strongest argument for CAVA centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 20.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CAVA

The primary concerns for CAVA are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. A P/E of 156.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CAVA profiles as a growth stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CAVA carries more volatility with a beta of 2.18 — expect wider price swings.

CAVA is growing revenue faster at 20.9% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (441M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (57/100 vs 34/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CAVA Group, Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

CAVA Group, Inc. owns and operates a chain of Mediterranean restaurants. The company is headquartered in Washington, District of Columbia.

Visit Website →

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?