WallStSmart

Caleres Inc (CAL)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 303% more annual revenue ($11.10B vs $2.76B). LULU leads profitability with a 14.2% profit margin vs -0.2%. CAL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.82. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

CAL

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

LULU

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CALSignificantly Overvalued (-175.2%)

Margin of Safety

-175.2%

Fair Value

$4.35

Current Price

$11.45

$7.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $4.35Overvalued
LULUSignificantly Overvalued (-95.2%)

Margin of Safety

-95.2%

Fair Value

$90.10

Current Price

$158.72

$68.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.10Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CAL3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.828/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
16.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.908/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

Areas to Watch

CAL4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$363.70M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.6%2/10

ROE of -1.6% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-94.1%2/10

Earnings declined 94.1%

Profit MarginProfitability
-0.2%1/10

Currently unprofitable

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.8%4/10

0.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CAL

The strongest argument for CAL centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.82 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.90 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CAL

The primary concerns for CAL are Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CAL profiles as a turnaround stock while LULU is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

CAL is growing revenue faster at 8.7% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (960M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (65/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Caleres Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Caleres, Inc. is engaged in the retail and wholesale of footwear in the United States, China, Canada, China, and Guam. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?