WallStSmart

Peabody Energy Corp (BTU)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 8288% more annual revenue ($323.90B vs $3.86B). XOM leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -1.4%. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

BTU

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

XOM

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BTUOvervalued (-6.4%)

Margin of Safety

-6.4%

Fair Value

$34.56

Current Price

$27.44

$7.12 premium

UndervaluedFair: $34.56Overvalued
XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-46.3%)

Margin of Safety

-46.3%

Fair Value

$105.46

Current Price

$154.33

$48.87 premium

UndervaluedFair: $105.46Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BTU1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$642.90B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.23B8/10

Generating 5.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

BTU4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

Operating margin of 2.0%

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.2%2/10

ROE of -1.2% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Revenue declined 9.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-62.6%2/10

Earnings declined 62.6%

XOM3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.3%2/10

Revenue declined 1.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BTU

The strongest argument for BTU centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BTU

The primary concerns for BTU are Operating Margin, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BTU profiles as a turnaround stock while XOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BTU carries more volatility with a beta of 0.62 — expect wider price swings.

XOM is growing revenue faster at -1.3% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (5.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XOM scores higher overall (50/100 vs 39/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Peabody Energy Corp

ENERGY · THERMAL COAL · USA

Peabody Energy Corporation is engaged in the coal mining business in the United States, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, China, India, Vietnam, South Korea, and internationally. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?