WallStSmart

Baytex Energy Corp (BTE)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 872% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $1.49B). FANG leads profitability with a 2.0% profit margin vs -49.8%. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).

BTE

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.60

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BTEOvervalued (-7.0%)

Margin of Safety

-7.0%

Fair Value

$3.73

Current Price

$3.99

$0.26 premium

UndervaluedFair: $3.73Overvalued
FANGUndervalued (+40.9%)

Margin of Safety

+40.9%

Fair Value

$286.16

Current Price

$179.91

$106.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.16Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BTE2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$50.61B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

BTE4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-34.6%2/10

ROE of -34.6% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-82.6%2/10

Earnings declined 82.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-29.60M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BTE

The strongest argument for BTE centers on Debt/Equity, Price/Book.

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bear Case : BTE

The primary concerns for BTE are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 185.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BTE profiles as a turnaround stock while FANG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BTE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.58 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (41/100 vs 33/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Baytex Energy Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Baytex Energy Corp. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Visit Website →

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?