WallStSmart

Bloom Energy Corp (BE)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 453% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $2.45B). BE leads profitability with a 0.3% profit margin vs -1.6%. BE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.53. BE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

BE

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.52

WPP

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BE.

WPPUndervalued (+75.6%)

Margin of Safety

+75.6%

Fair Value

$75.12

Current Price

$17.90

$57.22 discount

UndervaluedFair: $75.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
130.4%10/10

Revenue surging 130.4% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$73.57B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

BE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.534/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
1.3%3/10

ROE of 1.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.3%3/10

0.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BE

The strongest argument for BE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 130.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : BE

The primary concerns for BE are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 0.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BE profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

BE carries more volatility with a beta of 3.83 — expect wider price swings.

BE is growing revenue faster at 130.4% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BE scores higher overall (40/100 vs 32/100) and 130.4% revenue growth. WPP offers better value entry with a 75.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Bloom Energy Corp

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Bloom Energy Corporation designs, manufactures and sells solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation in the United States, Japan, China, India, and the Republic of Korea. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?