WallStSmart

Bloom Energy Corp (BE)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 569% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $2.02B). WPP leads profitability with a -1.6% profit margin vs -4.4%. WPP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.23. WPP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 35/100 (F).

BE

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 3.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.52

WPP

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.9%10/10

Revenue surging 35.9% year-over-year

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

BE4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.272/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
48.5x2/10

Trading at 48.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.7%2/10

ROE of -12.7% — below average capital efficiency

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BE

The strongest argument for BE centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 35.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : BE

The primary concerns for BE are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BE profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

BE carries more volatility with a beta of 3.18 — expect wider price swings.

BE is growing revenue faster at 35.9% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BE scores higher overall (35/100 vs 35/100) and 35.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Bloom Energy Corp

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Bloom Energy Corporation designs, manufactures and sells solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation in the United States, Japan, China, India, and the Republic of Korea. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?