WallStSmart

Bloom Energy Corp (BE)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 3608% more annual revenue ($75.05B vs $2.02B). LMT leads profitability with a 6.7% profit margin vs -4.4%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.31. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

BE

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 3.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.52

LMT

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BE.

LMTUndervalued (+37.5%)

Margin of Safety

+37.5%

Fair Value

$1005.73

Current Price

$615.84

$389.89 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1005.73Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.9%10/10

Revenue surging 35.9% year-over-year

LMT4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
76.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 77 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
161.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 161.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$141.93B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.76B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

BE4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.272/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
48.5x2/10

Trading at 48.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.7%2/10

ROE of -12.7% — below average capital efficiency

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.7x4/10

Moderate valuation

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
21.0x2/10

Trading at 21.0x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BE

The strongest argument for BE centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 35.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. PEG of 1.31 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BE

The primary concerns for BE are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BE profiles as a hypergrowth stock while LMT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BE carries more volatility with a beta of 3.18 — expect wider price swings.

BE is growing revenue faster at 35.9% — sustainability is the question.

LMT generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (65/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Bloom Energy Corp

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Bloom Energy Corporation designs, manufactures and sells solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation in the United States, Japan, China, India, and the Republic of Korea. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?