WallStSmart

Bloom Energy Corp (BE)vsEspey Mfg & Electronics Corp (ESP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Bloom Energy Corp generates 7269% more annual revenue ($3.11B vs $42.25M). ESP leads profitability with a 25.5% profit margin vs 7.9%. ESP trades at a lower P/E of 16.3x. ESP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

BE

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.15

ESP

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.31
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BE.

ESPSignificantly Overvalued (-74.5%)

Margin of Safety

-74.5%

Fair Value

$32.43

Current Price

$63.69

$31.26 premium

UndervaluedFair: $32.43Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BE3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
165.5%10/10

Revenue surging 165.5% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$81.22B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.588/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

ESP6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
57.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 57.1% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
21.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
25.5%9/10

Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
26.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.1%

Areas to Watch

BE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.743/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
353.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

ESP2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$186.41M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BE

The strongest argument for BE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 165.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : ESP

The strongest argument for ESP centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.5% and operating margin at 26.1%. Revenue growth of 10.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BE

The primary concerns for BE are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 353.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.74 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : ESP

The primary concerns for ESP are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BE profiles as a hypergrowth stock while ESP is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

BE carries more volatility with a beta of 3.81 — expect wider price swings.

BE is growing revenue faster at 165.5% — sustainability is the question.

BE generates stronger free cash flow (175M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ESP scores higher overall (60/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 25.5% margins and 10.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Bloom Energy Corp

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Bloom Energy Corporation designs, manufactures and sells solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation in the United States, Japan, China, India, and the Republic of Korea. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Espey Mfg & Electronics Corp

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Espey Mfg. The company is headquartered in Saratoga Springs, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?