WallStSmart

Brookfield Business Partners LP (BBU)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Brookfield Business Partners LP generates 3446% more annual revenue ($27.46B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs -0.1%. BBU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

BBU

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 3/9

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BBU2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
80.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 80.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Areas to Watch

BBU4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
2.4%3/10

ROE of 2.4% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.5%2/10

Revenue declined 4.5%

Profit MarginProfitability
-0.1%1/10

Currently unprofitable

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BBU

The strongest argument for BBU centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bear Case : BBU

The primary concerns for BBU are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 19.07 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BBU profiles as a turnaround stock while KEN is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

BBU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.32 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

BBU generates stronger free cash flow (763M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BBU scores higher overall (52/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Business Partners LP

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Brookfield Business Partners LP (BBU) is a leading global alternative asset manager that focuses on acquiring, operating, and enhancing a diversified portfolio of high-quality, cash-generating businesses. Capitalizing on the robust resources and expertise of its parent company, Brookfield Asset Management, BBU strategically invests in sectors such as industrials, utilities, and consumer products, employing a disciplined approach to operational improvements. With an emphasis on delivering sustainable cash distributions and capital appreciation, BBU is well-equipped to capitalize on growth opportunities, positioning itself to generate superior returns for its investors over the long term.

Visit Website →

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?