WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsCitigroup Inc. (C)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Citigroup Inc. generates 1535% more annual revenue ($78.73B vs $4.82B). BAM leads profitability with a 51.6% profit margin vs 20.4%. C appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.71. C earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 82/100 (A-).

BAM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9

C

Exceptional Buy

82

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 6.5Value: 7.0Quality: 5.0

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Profit MarginProfitability
51.6%10/10

Keeps 52 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
67.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 67.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$79.93B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

C6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Market CapQuality
$225.82B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
34.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 34.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
56.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 56.1% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
20.4%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.718/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.9x4/10

Trading at 9.9x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.7%2/10

Earnings declined 20.7%

C2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.7%3/10

ROE of 7.7% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-23.29B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.6% and operating margin at 67.9%. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : C

The strongest argument for C centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.4% and operating margin at 34.1%. Revenue growth of 16.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : C

The primary concerns for C are Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor ASSET MANAGEMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

C scores higher overall (82/100 vs 66/100), backed by strong 20.4% margins and 16.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

Citigroup Inc.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Citigroup Inc. is an American multinational investment bank and financial services corporation headquartered in New York City. The company was formed by the merger of banking giant Citicorp and financial conglomerate Travelers Group in 1998; Travelers was subsequently spun off from the company in 2002. Citigroup owns Citicorp, the holding company for Citibank, as well as several international subsidiaries. Citigroup is incorporated in Delaware.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?