WallStSmart

Braskem SA Class A (BAK)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Braskem SA Class A generates 1159% more annual revenue ($66.75B vs $5.30B). SQM leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs -13.7%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.34. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

BAK

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.13

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.04

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAK2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
107.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 107.2% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-4.3010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

BAK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.66B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-549.0%2/10

ROE of -549.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-20.4%2/10

Revenue declined 20.4%

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAK

The strongest argument for BAK centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BAK

The primary concerns for BAK are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAK profiles as a turnaround stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SQM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 38/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Braskem SA Class A

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Braskem SA produces and markets thermoplastic resins. The company is headquartered in Camaari, Brazil.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?