WallStSmart

Braskem SA Class A (BAK)vsRio Tinto ADR (RIO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Braskem SA Class A generates 16% more annual revenue ($66.75B vs $57.64B). RIO leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs -13.7%. BAK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.46. RIO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

BAK

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.13

RIO

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 2.08
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BAK.

RIOUndervalued (+24.5%)

Margin of Safety

+24.5%

Fair Value

$130.00

Current Price

$100.69

$29.31 discount

UndervaluedFair: $130.00Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAK2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
107.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 107.2% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-4.3010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

RIO6 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
34.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

Market CapQuality
$168.54B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
17.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.3%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.53B8/10

Generating 2.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

BAK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.66B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-549.0%2/10

ROE of -549.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-20.4%2/10

Revenue declined 20.4%

RIO3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.692/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.6%2/10

Earnings declined 5.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAK

The strongest argument for BAK centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : RIO

The strongest argument for RIO centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 25.3%. Revenue growth of 14.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BAK

The primary concerns for BAK are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : RIO

The primary concerns for RIO are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAK profiles as a turnaround stock while RIO is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

RIO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.

RIO is growing revenue faster at 14.6% — sustainability is the question.

RIO generates stronger free cash flow (2.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

RIO scores higher overall (54/100 vs 38/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins and 14.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Braskem SA Class A

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Braskem SA produces and markets thermoplastic resins. The company is headquartered in Camaari, Brazil.

Rio Tinto ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

Rio Tinto Group is dedicated to the exploration, extraction and processing of mineral resources worldwide. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?