WallStSmart

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsUnder Armour Inc C (UA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 21095% more annual revenue ($1.04T vs $4.93B). BABA leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs -10.0%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.52. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

BABA

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 8.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.02

UA

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.5Value: 5.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BABAUndervalued (+58.3%)

Margin of Safety

+58.3%

Fair Value

$365.09

Current Price

$109.30

$255.79 discount

UndervaluedFair: $365.09Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BABA4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$281.47B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.528/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BABA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

UA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.634/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-35.0%2/10

ROE of -35.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BABA

The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.52 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UA

The strongest argument for UA centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BABA

The primary concerns for BABA are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : UA

The primary concerns for UA are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BABA profiles as a value stock while UA is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

UA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.62 — expect wider price swings.

BABA is growing revenue faster at 8.6% — sustainability is the question.

UA generates stronger free cash flow (95M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BABA scores higher overall (55/100 vs 43/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.

Under Armour Inc C

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL MANUFACTURING · USA

Under Armour, Inc. is an American sports equipment company that manufactures footwear, sports and casual apparel. Under Armour's global headquarters are located in Baltimore, Maryland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?