Auna S.A. (AUNA)vsFresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)
AUNA
Auna S.A.
$5.82
-1.36%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $417.43M
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
$22.03
+0.59%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $12.47B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 348% more annual revenue ($19.63B vs $4.39B). FMS leads profitability with a 5.0% profit margin vs 2.2%. FMS trades at a lower P/E of 11.2x. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).
AUNA
Hold49
out of 100
Grade: D+
FMS
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-88.4%
Fair Value
$2.58
Current Price
$5.82
$3.24 premium
Margin of Safety
+73.4%
Fair Value
$90.32
Current Price
$22.03
$68.29 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency
2.2% margin — thin
Earnings declined 50.9%
4.2% earnings growth
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 7.9% — below average capital efficiency
5.0% margin — thin
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : AUNA
The strongest argument for AUNA centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.
Bull Case : FMS
The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : AUNA
The primary concerns for AUNA are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : FMS
The primary concerns for FMS are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
AUNA is growing revenue faster at 6.6% — sustainability is the question.
FMS generates stronger free cash flow (564M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
FMS scores higher overall (62/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Auna S.A.
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
Auna S.A. is a leading telecommunications and digital services provider in Latin America, delivering integrated solutions that enhance connectivity and customer experience. The company offers a wide range of services, including high-speed internet, television, and mobile offerings, serving both residential and business clients across diverse markets. Auna's commitment to innovation and exceptional customer care has solidified its position as a significant player in the region's evolving digital landscape, while its robust infrastructure positions it well to capitalize on the increasing demand for advanced telecom solutions, presenting valuable growth opportunities for institutional investors.
Visit Website →Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.
Visit Website →Compare with Other MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?