WallStSmart

Amazon.com Inc (AMZN)vsMDJM Ltd (UOKA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Amazon.com Inc generates 1195670337% more annual revenue ($716.92B vs $59,960). AMZN leads profitability with a 10.8% profit margin vs 0.0%. AMZN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

AMZN

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.33

UOKA

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AMZNSignificantly Overvalued (-66.2%)

Margin of Safety

-66.2%

Fair Value

$159.49

Current Price

$265.06

$105.57 premium

UndervaluedFair: $159.49Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UOKA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AMZN3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Market CapQuality
$2.85T10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Free Cash FlowQuality
$14.94B10/10

Generating 14.9B in free cash flow

Return on EquityProfitability
22.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

UOKA2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
116.4%10/10

Revenue surging 116.4% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

AMZN3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.904/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
31.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

UOKA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$18.05M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AMZN

The strongest argument for AMZN centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow, Return on Equity. Revenue growth of 13.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UOKA

The strongest argument for UOKA centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 116.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AMZN

The primary concerns for AMZN are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : UOKA

The primary concerns for UOKA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AMZN profiles as a value stock while UOKA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

AMZN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.38 — expect wider price swings.

UOKA is growing revenue faster at 116.4% — sustainability is the question.

AMZN generates stronger free cash flow (14.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AMZN scores higher overall (59/100 vs 33/100) and 13.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Amazon.com Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Amazon.com, Inc. is an American multinational technology company which focuses on e-commerce, cloud computing, digital streaming, and artificial intelligence. It is one of the Big Five companies in the U.S. information technology industry, along with Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook. The company has been referred to as one of the most influential economic and cultural forces in the world, as well as the world's most valuable brand.

Visit Website →

MDJM Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LODGING · USA

MDJM Ltd provides end-to-end services in the life cycle of a residential real estate project in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Cupar, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?