WallStSmart

American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD)vsWhirlpool Corporation (WHR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Whirlpool Corporation generates 920% more annual revenue ($15.52B vs $1.52B). WHR leads profitability with a 2.1% profit margin vs 1.1%. WHR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.04. WHR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

AMWD

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

WHR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.26
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AMWDSignificantly Overvalued (-657.2%)

Margin of Safety

-657.2%

Fair Value

$7.89

Current Price

$41.11

$33.22 premium

UndervaluedFair: $7.89Overvalued
WHRSignificantly Overvalued (-141.2%)

Margin of Safety

-141.2%

Fair Value

$38.49

Current Price

$55.22

$16.73 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.49Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AMWD1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WHR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

AMWD4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.484/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
32.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$542.72M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
1.9%3/10

ROE of 1.9% — below average capital efficiency

WHR4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.4%3/10

Operating margin of 3.4%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.9%2/10

Revenue declined 0.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AMWD

The strongest argument for AMWD centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : WHR

The strongest argument for WHR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : AMWD

The primary concerns for AMWD are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Market Cap. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WHR

The primary concerns for WHR are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AMWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

WHR is growing revenue faster at -0.9% — sustainability is the question.

WHR generates stronger free cash flow (1.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WHR scores higher overall (51/100 vs 43/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

American Woodmark Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

American Woodmark Corporation manufactures and distributes kitchen, bathroom and home organization products for the remodeling and new home construction markets in the United States. The company is headquartered in Winchester, Virginia.

Whirlpool Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

The Whirlpool Corporation is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of home appliances, headquartered in Benton Charter Township, Michigan, United States.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?