WallStSmart

American Shared Hospital Service (AMS)vsFresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 66608% more annual revenue ($19.63B vs $29.42M). FMS leads profitability with a 5.0% profit margin vs -7.6%. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

AMS

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 3.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0

FMS

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for AMS.

FMSUndervalued (+73.4%)

Margin of Safety

+73.4%

Fair Value

$90.32

Current Price

$22.03

$68.29 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AMS1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

FMS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

AMS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.5%4/10

2.5% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$13.20M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
0.7%3/10

Operating margin of 0.7%

Return on EquityProfitability
-11.9%2/10

ROE of -11.9% — below average capital efficiency

FMS4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.824/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
7.9%3/10

ROE of 7.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.0%3/10

5.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AMS

The strongest argument for AMS centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : FMS

The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : AMS

The primary concerns for AMS are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : FMS

The primary concerns for FMS are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AMS profiles as a turnaround stock while FMS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

FMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

AMS is growing revenue faster at 2.5% — sustainability is the question.

FMS generates stronger free cash flow (564M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FMS scores higher overall (62/100 vs 32/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

American Shared Hospital Service

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

American Shared Hospital Services rents radiosurgery and radiation therapy equipment to healthcare providers. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?